!publish!

This commit is contained in:
Valeria Graziano 2022-09-27 00:48:32 -07:00
parent ae816989d3
commit c31c593e63

View file

@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ has_items=["item3.md", "item4.md"]
![](static/images/modernissimo.png)
Italy was the second country in Western capitalist Europe (after the UK, 1948) to achieve the right to a public healthcare system in 1978. To these days, the Italian national healthcare system remains an odd story of success despite many counter-reforms. As Chiara Giorgi noted,
> According to the 2017 OECD data, life expectancy at birth in Italy is 83.1 years, compared to the 80.9 years of the European Union average: but the total health expenditure per inhabitant is 2,483 euros, against 2,884 of the average EU (a 15% gap). It is a paradox worth probing that the European country with the longest life expectancy has achieved this result with reduced spending.
@ -16,9 +18,14 @@ Italy was the second country in Western capitalist Europe (after the UK, 1948) t
However, in the 60s, the national health conditions were dire. Italy had an average was of one death in the workplace per hour and one accident per minute (source: http://salus.adapt.it/infortuni-e-morti-sul-lavoro-i-dati-dal-1951-al-1970/. By comparison, today there are 3 deaths per day and 800.000 accidents per year).
So in the 60s, as the country was undergoing massive industrialization, the idea of a “class war” was really a reality that workers could witness every day. And these were only numbers linked to direct deaths at work, without taking into consideration the indirect effects of environmental degradation and chronic conditions that begun to flare up at the time.
![](static/images/1morto.jpg)
So in the 60s, as the country was undergoing massive industrialization, the idea of a “class war” was really a reality that workers could witness every day. And these were only numbers linked to direct deaths at work, without taking into consideration the indirect effects of environmental degradation and chronic conditions that begun to flare up at the time.
# Noxiousness at Work and from Work
To address this scenario, political movements begun to focus on the key term *nocività* translatable as 'noxiousness' in English. This choice of term is crucial: the struggles for health begun as the political questioning of its opposite which these movements identified not in sickness nor in fitness, or the capacity to optimally perform work.
@ -26,8 +33,7 @@ Noxiousness instead is the property of damaging a living process and to provoke
So by focusing on noxiousness - which is produced and not a condition of the individual body, as sickness is - these movements open up the problem of health in a strategic way. They linked the wellbeing of workers, who were exposed to toxicity at work, with that of their living conditions in their neighbourhoods which were destitute and polluted, and with the conditions of domestic labour, and with the impact of capitalist production over the broader environment.
# Noxiousness at Work and from Work
## The Work Environment
LAmbiente di Lavoro (The Work Environment) is the title a trade union pamphlet first put out in 1967. This was a risk analysis tool produced by the union FIOM_CGIL (one of the major Italian workers union, the most left leaning one and associated with the Communist Party).
@ -42,7 +48,7 @@ The Work Environment was a tool for organizers and workers together to begin to
These four noxiousness factors made discussing health conditions easier. The classification it proposed was of immediate understandability because it was based on the experience of workers.
We explored more in detail the technique used to first produce this pamphlet **here**.
## Against Noxiousness
Another key document to understand the intertwining of the politics for work, health and environment of the itme was *Against Noxiousness*, a political communiqué written in 1971 by the group Comitato Politico degli Operai di Porto Marghera, a political collective where renown autonomist thinkers such as Maria Rosa Dalla Costa and Toni Negri begun their militancy. The activities of this group and the context of Porto Marghera, which is the site of a petrol-chemical plant near Venice, have been the focus of some recent research by Lorenzo Feltrin and Devi Sacchetto, which maked some of this history available in the English language.
@ -60,7 +66,7 @@ So, in this document we can see the leap from the problem of noxiousness at work
The group were in this sense also critical of the trade unions and the communist party's efforts to promote the public health system and the participation of workers council in determining health and safety conditions, as they saw these measures as too easily coopeted into weak reformism.
# The 4th Noxiousness Factor: the Mental Load
## The 4th Factor: the Mental Load
*The Work Environment* first produced at FIAT and *Against Noxiousness* of Porto Marghera agreed in identifying one mid-term tendency crucially relevant in our present times: mental noxiousness.