From 4762a994d94da645607cb80c01ac7256a3e9ca83 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Valeria Graziano Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 03:45:20 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] !publish! --- content/section/faintinginjections.md | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/content/section/faintinginjections.md b/content/section/faintinginjections.md index 601f994..2653c90 100644 --- a/content/section/faintinginjections.md +++ b/content/section/faintinginjections.md @@ -94,7 +94,9 @@ So, in this document we can see the leap from the problem of noxiousness at work The group were in this sense also critical of the trade unions and the communist party's efforts to promote the public health system and the participation of workers’ council in determining health and safety conditions, as they saw these measures as too easily coopeted into weak reformism. -# Against the healhtcare reformism +# Against healhtcare reformism + +![](static/images/sanita_sfruttamento.png) In the context of such debates on noxiousness, a poignant critique was developed amongst political collectives of medical students close to the positions of autonomous Marxism, who identified a fundamental weakness in the way the principal trade unions were using the new knowledges around noxious working environements coming from wokers' enquiries to implement a reformist policy of compromise. As summarised in one pamphlet, the fear was that trade unions would end up being complicit in a " possible capitalist use of prevention" wihtout being able "to even immagine the probable functionality of 'healthcare riformism' for the current phase of capitalist development as a control operation, of maintenace, of improvement, of recuperation of workforce' productivity - so that the 'right to health and safety' would just be an indispensible precondition for the 'right to be expolited'.