Dotawo/content/article/hamdeen.md

---
title: "From Homescape to Flora Landscape: Preliminary Observation on Plant Remains from the Christian Mud-Buildings in the Third Cataract Region"
authors: ["hamadhamdeen.md"]
abstract: In Sudan, the study of earthen construction materials is very rare, mudbricks were and still are widely used as building materials in many regions. This paper gives a new perspective for applying the technique of extorted plant remains from mudbrick in Sudan. The material was collected during the fieldwork of Mahas Archaeological project in April 2019 from four Christian mudbrick sites (TMB016, MAS021, DFF008, and DFF009), were approximately four kilograms (one kilogram from each site). The material was soaked in water for six hours to dissolve the hard mud and sand. Two metal sieves with a mesh size of 0.5 and 1 mm were used. The separated material was dried and examined under binoculars and for identification fresh seed was used as a reference collection and determination literature. Seven plant species were encountered as seeds\\fruits were extracted and identified include: Triticum aestivum, Hordeum vulgare, Sorghum bicolor, Setaria italica, Adansonia digitate, Acacia nilotica and Cyperus rotundus. In addition, some large unidentified deposits of glumes of wild grasses (family: Poaceae) were presented in the samples from the four sites. Some animal dung and insect remains were separated during the sorting processing of the plant macro-remains. The archaeobotanical evidence from these four Christian mudbrick sites in El Mahas region provided evidence of the economy and flora landscape in this area. This flora can be divided into three types: riverine wild flora, cultivated flora, and wild trees.
keywords: ["Archaeobotany", "Plant remains", "Mudbrick", "Third Cataract", "Sudan"]
---


# Introduction

Mudbrick materials provide a source of environmental data to aid in
understanding the diversity of local sediments and flora. Most studies
begin with examining the origins of brick materials, which also can be
studied as chronological markers, technology as social practice, as
indicators of social class or cultural identity, and as a source of
environmental information.[^1] Given the active role of architecture as
material culture mudbricks are a good source of botanical evidence since
they often include desiccated chaff, straw, fruits, and seeds, chaff
impressions, phytoliths, diatoms, and pollen.[^2]

Archaeologically, earth construction techniques have been known for
over 9000 years. Mudbrick (adobe) houses dating from 8000 to 6000 BCE
have been discovered in Russian Turkestan.[^3] Rammed earth
foundations dating from ca. 5000 BCE have been discovered in Assyria.
Earth was used as the building material in all ancient cultures, not
only for homes but for religious buildings as well.[^4] In Sudan, the
study of earthen construction materials is very rare, mudbricks were
considered common building materials that were used in Sudan from 2500
BCE, during

the Kerma period, and are still widely used as building materials in
many regions of Sudan. The materials used to make these bricks include
Nile mud, sand, chopped straw, and animal dung. Makers mixed these
materials in varying quantities to produce bricks with different
characteristics.

Most importantly, these added materials vastly improve the tensile
strength of bricks. Straw, and sometimes chaff, has always been the
preferred type of temper. Alternatives may include chopped grasses or
weeds, tree bark, and potsherds.[^5] Hillman appropriately
distinguishes between various classes of vegetal temper according to
their derivation from the process of winnowing and coarse-sieving
cereals, highlighting their commonly assigned different uses.[^6] The
first type, "fragmented light straw," is probably the type of vegetal
temper most commonly used in mudbricks. The second type,
"medium-coarse winnowed straw," features more commonly in mud plaster
or is used as fuel; and the third is "chaff," which results from a
later step during cereal processing, and may be used for bricks or
wall plaster.[^7]

From a general view of home architecture in ancient Sudan, two types
of homescape can be distinguished: external and internal, in which
plants are essential elements in both. Plant remains can help us to
understand the architectural style of houses of the external
homescape, such as wood, which represents an essential part of the
architectural construction elements in mud buildings, as it has been
used as roofs and pillars to support the roofs of buildings since
early periods in Sudan. Also, hardwood trees represent an essential
architectural element in the design and decoration of doors and
windows. Also, in this type of home, *Rakoba* or *Arishah* is a
crucial element of the house and is used for recreation and protection
from the sun and heat during the hot summer seasons. Many trunks,
stems and branches of trees are used in its construction of *Rakoba*,
in addition to palm and doum fronds. The trunks and stems of large
trees also play an essential role in the building of animal pens.

As for the elements of the interior homescape, wood, palm and doum
fronds are used as a basic element in the manufacture of home
furniture, such as beds, wooden chairs, and *brooches* that are used
as rugs for sitting, in addition to the use of palm and doum palm
leaves in the manufacture of ropes, shoes, also were used as hangers
called locally "*mashlaib*" which are used to place food utensils in
high areas of the ground and *Tabag* which used for the covering food.
In the internal homescape of Sudanese houses wood is also used to
manufacture what is called "Sahara" which is used to store clothes,
decorative items, and other items inside homes. In addition, human
clothing is made from materials that come directly or indirectly from
plant fibers, and there is much evidence of textiles made from cotton
and linen reported from archaeological sites in Sudan. In the process
of preparing foods, there are many household tools in which wood and
plants are the basic elements in their manufacture, such as what is
called "*fondoak*" and "*maddak*" which are used to grinding grains
and other food items. Other tools that were used in the homes such as
spoons and handles for knives were made from the plants.

There is no doubt that plants are an essential element in the
manufacture of equipment and tools in agricultural societies from
ancient Sudan. The archaeological record of many sites in Sudan
provides much evidence of composite agricultural tools, i.e. wood and
plants formed part of them, such as the *shadoof* and the *saqiya*,
which wood and plants form the basic elements in the manufacture of
all parts, as well as other agricultural tools, such as shovels,
sickles, rakes, garden hoes, shears, and mattock.

In terms of daily lifestyle, the remains of grains and cereals
provided evidence of the types of plants that were used as a part of
human foods and drinks. There are two types of plant foods and drinks
in Sudan; fermented and unfermented foods, which include bread,
porridge, and *Kisra*, and drinks such as local wine, *Hulu-mur*,
*Abreh*, *Sharbat* and others.

# Area of study

The El Mahas region lies along the Nile, in northern Sudan (Fig.1)
beginning at the north end of the Dongola Reach and extending from the
area of the villages of Hannik (west bank) and Tombos (east bank), at
the top of the Third Cataract, downriver as far as the area of Jebel
Dosha (west bank) and Wawa (east bank), in the north. Its northern
boundary is most visibly marked by the cliff-face known as Jebel Dosha
which overlooks the west bank of the river some five kilometers
downstream of Soleb, the end of a long ridge that runs approximately
three kilometers into the desert to the west-north- west, forming a
prominent natural feature, the region extends over a distance of
approximately 141 kilometers (ca. 88 miles) from Hannik to Wawa.
Within this area, the landscape is highly varied, including some very
fertile localities with abundant alluvial soils but also many
extremely barren and inhospitable areas (Osman and Edwards 2012: 6-7).
The Mahas Archaeological Project, directed by Prof. Ali Osman,
identified four Christian mudbrick sites located in the different
three main areas (north, middle, and south) of the El Mahas region in
April 2019. I chose these four sites to serve as case studies for the
study of mudbrick inclusions in Christian Sudan.

These four sites can be described in brief as follows:

**Site (1) TMB016** (19°42.935/30°22.72)**:** This site was located
near the north end of Dabaki island on a prominent rock outcrop
overlooking the river. Here, the denuded remains of a massively built
mudbrick enclosure, measuring approximately 75 x 35 meters, aligned
approximately east-west. The only large areas of brickwork which
survive are in the western corner towers and in the southeast quadrant
where the walls measure over 3.5 meters thick and more than 4 meters
high in some places. Perhaps they were elements of a fortified gateway
opening to the south. Built on a very irregular surface, parts of the
walls have substantial stone foundations, while other parts were built
directly onto granite boulders. The builders used large bricks
measuring approximately 39 x 20 x 11 centimeters. Within the
enclosure, the only surviving structure is a small mudbrick church
measuring 16.5 x 10.3 meters, with walls standing up to 2 meters high,
constructed on a substantial mudbrick platform In the southwest corner
the lower part of a stairway survives rising over a small vaulted
chamber. Most of the surface sherds appear to date to the Christian
period (Osman and Edwards 2012) (Fig.2a).

**Site (2) MAS021** (19°53.012/30°23.575)**:** The site is a medieval
church built amongst large boulders of a small rocky spur running west
from Jebel Barja. This small, well-preserved mudbrick church measures
approximately 8.5 x 9.5 meters and in places stands over 4 meters
tall. Its east end is built against a massive boulder with rock
drawings of a large human figure and two animals. The base of a small
central dome survives, and traces of inscribed texts and wall
paintings are visible on mud wall plaster. One local name for the site
is Hambujneen Kisse (Osman and Edwards 2012) (Fig.2b).

**Site (3) DFF008** (19°56.932/30°30.138)**:** The site is situated on
a rocky hillock, with modern buildings on lower ground below the hill.
It is a well-preserved medieval settlement known by local people as
Tinutti. At least five substantial mudbrick structures can be
identified. It is well-preserved. Several rooms still retain their
barrel vaulting and parts of the central structure stand nearly 5
meters high.

The more fragmentary remains of additional structures, including
rougher stone-built buildings, surround these upstanding remains. None
of the visible buildings appears to have been a church. Test
excavations by the University of Khartoum in Building A, a poorly
preserved structure, revealed most of its plan. Excavations also
revealed stone foundations beneath the mudbrick superstructure of
Building A. Aerial photos from the 1930s show that additional
substantial upstanding remains survived on the site at the time
(Fig.2c).[^8]

**Site (4) DFF009** (19°56.491/30°30.479)**:** This site was located
on bare rocks on the north side of the thin band of cultivation in an
otherwise inhospitable area of Haleeba. The main structure is a small
tower-house ('castle-house') with thick stone foundations up to two
meters high. Parts of its mudbrick superstructure still survive up to
six meters high in its northwest corner. Some traces of its internal
vaulted ceilings survive. No clearly defined entrance is visible in
the bottom story. Most of the lower rooms were probably accessible
only from above. Little surface pottery was found but the little that
survived appears to be 'Late' and 'Terminal Christian' ceramic types.
Outside this structure are traces of less substantial structures
surviving as a few courses of rough stone walling (Fig.2d).[^9]

Fig.1. The area of study

Fig (2): shown the sites; a) TMB016. b) MAS021. c) DFF008. d) DFF009
(photo Eng. Omer).

# Materials and Methods

The samples were collected from the mud-brick constructions from the
four sites (TMB016, MAS021, DFF008, and DFF009). The total volume of the
materials was approximately 4 kilograms (1 kilogram from each site). The
organic residues of plants and animals could be easily observed in the
samples before they floated in the water. The material was soaked in
water for six hours to dissolve the hard mud and to allow the wet
sieving to separate the plant\'s remains that were floated above the mud
and sand. Two metal sieves with a mesh size of 0.5 and 1 millimetres
were used for the wet sieving to separate the plant remains. The
separated material was dried and examined under binoculars in the
Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Arts, University of Al Neelain
(Sudan), and Institute of Archaeology, University of Nicolas Copernicus,
(Poland). To aid with identification, we used fresh seeds as a reference
collection alongside determination literature. Some animal dung and
insect remains were separated during the sorting processing of the plant
macro-remains.

# Results and Discussion

## Results of extracted plant remains from the Homescape

Seven plant species were encountered as seeds\\fruits were extracted and
identified from the mudbrick samples. The assemblage of seeds and fruits
were preserved by desiccation. Table (1) shows the Latin names of the
determined species and their distribution in the sites. The cereal
appeared clearly and can be identified from the seeds of the *Triticum
aestivum* (Fig.3a)*, Hordeum vulgare* (Fig.3b) added to some parts of
spikelets, chaffs, and glume fragments for those two cereals*. Sorghum
bicolor* was presented from spikelet with grain inside (Fig.4c) and
*Setaria italica* was also represented from their seeds. (Fig.3d)
*Adansonia digitate* appeared from small fragments of the fruit pulp
shell (Fig.3e) *Acacia nilotica* was identified from the seed remains
(Fig.3f) the *Cyperus rotundus* which appeared in the materials from the
complete purple nutsedge roots (Fig.3g). Some animal remains, animal
dung (Fig. 3h) and insect remains (Fig.3i) appeared in the samples. More
analysis for identification will be done at a later date.

Table (1) Plant species that were identified from the Samples

Animal dung, i. Insect remains (Photo: H.M.Hamdeen).

## Mudbrick as source of the plant remains

The material from mudbricks is an important source of archaeobotanical
and palaeoecological data of the crops, weeds, and other vegetation
along the Nile floodplain. The mixture of the plant macro remains in
mudbrick is heterogeneous because they came from different origins.
These differences originate partly from the clay itself, partly from the
plant materials added to the adobe as a temper, and partly from the
vegetation surrounding the site of brick manufacture.[^10]

The identified plant species were added to the adobes either as a part
of the temper or as an unintentional admixture coming into the mud
material during the adobe processing. The fibers serve a number of key
functions. First, they hinder cracking upon drying by distributing
tension throughout the bulk of the brick. Second, they accelerate
drying by improving outward drainage of moisture to the surface of the
brick. Third, they significantly reduce the bulk density of the brick,
lightening its weight and reducing its thermal conductivity. Most
importantly, they increase the tensile strength of the brick, the lack
of which is one of the inherent disadvantages of mudbrick.[^11] The
necessity of temper may vary depending on the quality of the sediment,
clay, and organic material that was added to the mudbrick.

Experts in Sudan rarely study the archaeobotanical remains from
mudbrick. Sergeev *et al* studied the considerable potential of
mudbricks as a source of the history, cultural practices, and
technologies of ancient societies that developed in a specific natural
environment.[^12] Their analysis focused on comparing two collections of
mudbricks from ancient capital regions of Egypt (Giza) and Sudan (Abu
Erteila). There were significantly different numbers of plant varieties
recovered between these two sites. More than 7500 plant macro remains
were recovered at Giza and only 430 at Abu Erteila. The difference was
pronounced in the concentration of macroremains of cultivated plants
which are common at Giza and are very rare in Abu Erteila. In addition,
carbonized archaeobotanical materials common in mudbricks from Egypt are
practically absent in all the samples from Sudan. Among the possible
reasons for the imbalance could be the humble vegetation and a lower
intensity of economic activity around Abu Erteila during the Meroitic
Period. Alternatively, the Meroitic people may have preferred to use
valuable organic waste from the processing of crops in other production
spheres such as, for example, animal husbandry.

The evidence from Christian mudbrick from the Third Cataract shows
that there is a high density of plant remains. This could be that
Christian people in this area preferred to use valuable organic waste
from the processing of crops in mudbrick production. This demonstrates
that there was a different mudbrick technique used at the Meroitic
sites in Central Sudan.

***The floral landscape in the third cataract during Christian period***

# [Cultivated flora]{.underline}

The archaeobotanical remains from the four Christian mudbrick
buildings in El Mahas region show four cultivated plants *Triticum
aestivum*, *Hordeum vulgare, Sorghum bicolor,* and *Setaria italica*.
These cereals are packed with starch that contains an appreciable
amount of protein. Food production in the Mediterranean basin, Europe,
the non-tropical parts of Asia, and (to some extent) the highlands of
Ethiopia, was based primarily on wheat and barley.[^13] The remains of
*Triticum aestivum* and *Hordeum vulgare* present as grains and
spikelets in the mudbrick samples from the four Christian sites. These
two plants have been reported at many archaeological sites in Sudan.
The analyses of phytoliths and starch grains from human dental
calculus of the Early and Middle Neolithic Sudanese cemeteries of
Ghaba in the Shandi reach and at R12 in the Dongola reach in Northern
Sudan, provide evidence of wheat and barley. This evidence suggests
that these domesticated taxa were introduced into Africa in the early
Neolithic. The pillow-like grave deposits provide information about
the role of plants in the burial ceremony, at site 8-B-52-A in Sai
Island, the site that dates to the pre-Kerma period.[^14] Also, the
pharaonic town at Amara West dates to 1250-1070 BCE.[^15] Remains of
*Triticum diococcum* have been reported at the Napatan site HP736 in
the Wadi Umm Rahau at the Fourth Nile Cataract, in the Egyptian and
Napatan site in Kawa, and from the same period outside the Nile
Valley, at Gala Abu Ahmad, located about 110 kilometers west of the
river in Wadi Howar, Meroe.[^16] These remains have also been found at
Christian sites such as Soba (Cartwright 1998; Van der Veen 1991),
Nauri (Fuller and Edwards 2001), El Hamra (Madani et al 2015), El
Mireibiet (Hamdeen et al 2018), and Banganarti (Hamdeen and Pokorny
2022). This domesticated cereal constitutes the main source of
calories for mankind. Cereals thrive in open ground and complete their
life cycle in less than a year. The nutritional value of their grains
generally is high, and the seeds can be stored for long periods. These two cereals remain common crops
in northern Sudan today. They provide important proteins for both
people and animals.

Other cereal remains can be found in this material. For example,
*Sorghum bicolor* is present in seed form from sites TMB016 and
Dff009. This plant is considered one of the world's five most
important cereals, but its origins are less well understood than the
others (namely rice, wheat, barley, maize).[^17] Sorghum is especially
important in the semiarid tropics of Africa and South Asia, with
significant production also in China, Southeast Asia, and the
Americas.[^18] There is clear evidence for the use of wild sorghum in
the eastern Sahara as early 6000 BCE and by Neolithic populations in
central Sudan by the fourth millennium BCE.[^19] Evidence for the
transition from wild sorghum to domesticated sorghum can be sequenced
in the stratigraphy of Qasr Ibrim. It suggests that domestication may
have been as late as the first centuries CE.[^20] Research from
eastern Sudan indicates sorghum was domesticated in the Fourth
Millennium BC, based on spikelet morphology from the ceramic
impression of the Butana Group (site KG 23) near Khashim el
Girba.[^21]

The last species of cereal type, *Setaria italica, was* reported as
seeds from two sites, MAS021 and DFF009. One of the pieces of evidence
in the area for this *Setaria* sp. was recovered from settlement
contexts at site Abu Darbien in central Sudan date back to 7860 cal.
BP.[^22] In the eastern Sudan from sites K1 I 5, S14d, 3-S5 dated to
Gash group 1500--1400 BCE. *Setaria* sp. was identified on the
exterior surface of pottery and not far from that site. *Setaria* sp.
also was recorded from site SEG 42 R 5 and dating to Hagiz Group 500
BCE--500 CE.[^23] Some remains of *Setaria* sp. have been identified
also in the organic residues in pots from early Meroitic cemetery at
Amir Abdallah.[^24] *Setaria italica* remains appeared together with a
related wild weedy grass identified as *Setaria cf. sphaceleata* at
the Christian site at Nauri on the opposite bank of the site
DF009.[^25] This evidence suggests that *Setaria* sp. is common in
this area of Sudan and that there may be some connection between these
two sites during Christian period.

The evidence of domesticated plants from our sites in the Third
Cataract provided a strong indication of the agricultural production
of these crops during the early, classic, and late Christian period.
The evidence of Nubia therefore suggests that the original agriculture
in Nubia focused on winter cultivation based on receding Nile floods.
The summer season of low flood would not have been conducive to
cultivation without irrigation, except over very limited land areas or
of very tolerant crops.[^26] But all this was ch[a]{.underline}nged
when the *saqiya* was introduced to Sudan during the Meriotic
period.[^27] More land was made available and more crops could be
produced. This development has important implications for the
potential density of the population, as more land will require more
labor, and two seasons 'winter and summer' of cultivation will tie
laborers to the land for a greater proportion of the year, thus
potentially removing some of their ability to be part- time
specialists during the non-agricultural seasons as potters.[^28] This
was confirmed by the high density of pottery sherds, kilns, and
several houses noted and documented on the Christian sites in the
Third Cataract and Dongola region.

The evidence of these cereals from the mud-building sites in the Third
Cataract indicates that these plants played a major role in the
economy and foods for humans and animals during the Christian 6th
to the 16th century CE in the Third Cataract region and northern
Sudan. This suggestion can be confirmed by historical texts dating to
this same period and other plants remains from Christian sites in
north and Central Sudan.[^29]

# [Riverine wild flora]{.underline}

The material under discussion also contained wild plant species, a few
of which have medical and ethnographic value. These plants were
probably collected or available for this purpose by people living in
the Christian settlements in the Third Cataract region. One of these
riverine wild floras is *Cyperus rotundus,* a type of grass that
appear from the complete purple nutsedge roots from site TMB016,
DFF008 and DFF009. This species has been in association with humans
from remote pre-history to the present. It was consumed as a food for
thousands of years in prehistoric times, but is viewed as a
troublesome weed in modern times. Abundant remains of *C. rotundus*
tuber, thought to have been collected as food, were found at the
18,000-year-old site of Wadi Kubbaniya, near Aswan, Egypt, and at
later sites at Al Khiday, 25 kilometers south of Omdurman.[^30] The
complex of burial sites has yielded dental calculus samples from
pre-Mesolithic, Neolithic, Late Meroitic, and Mesolithic ages,
covering more than 7000 years, Cyperaceae tuber was recoded from the
Kushite site at Kawa dating back to Napatan period 750-400 BCE.[^31]

Ecologically, *Cyperus rotundus* is commonly found in cultivated
areas, disturbed areas, roadsides, lawns, parks, and wastelands, and
is favored by moist, fertile soil conditions, and a warm climate.[^32]
Moisture and temperature are reported to be the most important factors
in restricting its possible distribution in agroecosystems.[^33]
Plants of *C. rotundus* continuously produce new tubers and successive
plants until the occurrence of frost over winter, which burns the
leaves and causes the tubers to enter into a state of dormancy.
*Cyperus rotundus* tubers are sensitive to saline conditions, low
temperatures, and shade.[^34] The extraction of chemical compounds and
microfossils from dental calculus derived from prehistoric skeletons
from the site of Al Khiday indicates that the tubers of *C. rotundus*
were used as food and may have served as a carbohydrate staple for
millennia. The evidence of this plant in the Third Cataract indicates
that the plants may have been used as food or a part of local
traditional perfume made by a woman in Sudan called (*Kunfer*).[^35]

Large deposits belong to glumes of wild grasses (family: *Poaceae*)
were presented in the samples from the four sites, but the species
remains unidentified. Generally, grasses have a high nutritional
value, and they have been collected for animal fodder or a part of the
clay and probably mixed with clay during the production of the
mudbrick.

## [Wild trees]{.underline}

The remains of *Adansonia digitate* appear from small fragments of the
fruit pulp in the site TMB 016 and site MAS 021. The ecological
conditions of this plant lead it to mainly grow in the hot and dry
savanna areas of sub-Saharan Africa. The plant is very effective in
preventing water loss and can flourish in sandy soils. In East Africa,
the trees grow in the shrublands and coastal areas. *Adansonia
digitata* is a traditional food plant in East and sub-Saharan Africa.
It has a rich medicinal and nutritional value, this species was
indigenous to West Africa and brought to Eastern Africa by a movement
of pastoralists.[^36] In the arid and semi-arid areas of sub-Saharan
Africa, the *Adansonia digitata* provides a variety of foodstuffs to
local communities, as well as fodder, fibers for weaving and
rope-making, gum, seed oil, natural medicine, materials for dishes,
and water storage.[^37] It can also be used for shelter and as a
gathering point for humans and their livestock.[^38] All across the
African continent, the sight of *A. digitata* has inspired tales,
poetry, songs, and legends. *A. digitata* have often commanded
compassion and even devotion.[^39]

The earliest archaeobotanical record from Sudan and northeast Africa
for this species came from site K1 IX in Kassala and dates to the Late
Gash Group context. This evidence was the charred seeds of *Adansonia
digitata* L. These findings suggest that this tree had already been
transferred from west to east across the savanna by the early second
millennium BCE.[^40] The evidence from the Third Cataract is
considered the second record for this species in the Sudan and
North-East Africa dating back to the early Christian period (sixth
century CE).

The *Acacia nilotica* belongs to the family Fabaceae. It is a widely
spread tree in the central and northern parts of the Sudan, known in
Sudanese folk medicine as *kaarad*.[^41] The species of Acacia is
found all over the world distributed in dry tropical and sub-tropical
regions. In Sudanese folk medicine, the fruits (pods) of *Acacia
nilotica* are used as aqueous macerates or in a powder form for the
treatment of pneumonia, tonsillitis, dysentery, diarrhea, and
malaria.[^42] The phytochemical studies on the pods of *Acacia
nilotica* showed some bioactive principles such as tannins, saponins,
glycosides, and flavonoids.[^43] Some studies showed that the pods of
*Acacia nilotica* have potential antioxidants and are found effective
in protecting plasmid DNA and human serum albumin protein oxidation
induced by hydroxyl radicals.[^44] It can be also used as fodder for
livestock in the dry lands of Sudan.[^45] The *Acacia sp*. remains
were recorded from many archaeological sites in this region such as at
Kawa, Nauri, and Banganarti.[^46] In the samples from the area study
the evidence of *Acacia nilotica* represented as seeds. Some tree bark
probably related to *Acacia sp*. were also reported. This plant had
medical uses in Sudan, but the archaeological evidence for plants
employed for medicinal purposes in Sudan is not clear. However,
physical anthropological analysis of human bones shows many diseases
during the Christian period, and according to ethnobotanical and
laboratory studies, some of these diseases could be cured by certain
plant species.[^47] Depending on the field observation, it is likely
that this plant was used for the medical value, animal fodder, fire
fuel and using for building houses and animal stockyard in the third
cataract region.

Lastly, the archaeobotanical evidence from the Christian mudbrick
sites in the El Mahas region provided some evidence of the flora
landscape. It can be divided into three types; riverine wild flora,
cultivated flora, and wild trees. It also a new perspective for
applying the technique of extorted plants remains from mudbrick in
Sudan and how the characteristics of mudbrick offer good conditions
for preserving organic remains. Some of the plant remains are still
undetermined, including some fragments of branches, charcoal, and
wood. Further palynological, carpological, and xylological analyses
studies in the future should provide a new data relating to the
domestication and natural vegetation of the area.

# Conclusions

The plant remains that were reported from the four Christian sites in
the Third Cataract region provide to us some information about the
homescape and landscape of this area. Evidences of *Triticum
aestivum*, *Hordeum vulgare, Sorghum bicolor,* and *Setaria italica*
show that they were probably used as some of the primary sources of
foodstuff for human and animal populations during the Christian
period. Many cereals, legumes, roots and tubers, fruits, nuts, and
leaves belonging to those species provided valuable and fundamental
diets for consumption to human foods and fodder for animals.

Our plant remains provided some evidence of the external and internal
homescape of the Third Cataract during the Christian period. *Acacia*
sp. and *Adansonia* sp. could be used as building materials in both
the exterior and interior shelters and homes. Some of these materials
are wood, timber, and straw, as well as hard trunks and tree branches
probably used as roofs and walls in the houses. Furniture was commonly
composed of *Acacia* woods.

From ancient times till nowadays, people used traditional herbal
medicines to treat their ailments; particularly in our materials
*Acacia nilotica* was presented and probably used for medical
purposes. The remains of the *Adansonia digitata* from the Third
Cataract was probably used in a variety of ways during the Christian
period for water storage, medical needs, and shelter as well. Today
Sudanese women employ *Cyperus rotundus* for cosmetic and perfumery
purposes, and it may have been used during the Christian period also.

There are three flora landscape in the area of study based on our
plant remains, cultivated flora which include the four cereals:
*Triticum aestivum*, *Hordeum vulgare, Sorghum bicolor,* and *Setaria
italica*. Riverine wild flora which can noted clearly form the remains
of *Cyperus rotundus* and some wild grasses*,* and lastly *Acacia
nilotica and Adansonia digitata*, which can be considered as two
models representing wild trees in the Third Cataract region during the
Christian period.

# Acknowledgements

Special thanks go to the El-Mahas Archaeological Project team in the
2019 season, and the director Prof Ali Osman Mohamed Salih, and the
people of Mashakiela village for their hospitality and generosity. The
following persons are also thanked: Eng. Omer for taking drone photos.
Eng. Medhat Mohamed Osman. Mr Basim Ali, Mr. Ahmed Ali Osman, and Mr.
Musaab Khair for their assistance with the fieldwork.

# References

Abdalla, M.S., Babiker, I.A., Al-Abrahim, J.S., Mohammed, A.E. Elobeid,
M.M., Elkhalifa, K.F. 2014. "Fodder potential and chemical composition of *Acacia
nilotica* fruits for livestock in the dry lands of Sudan".
*International Journal of Plant, Animal and Environmental Sciences*.
Vol 4 issue 1: 366- 369.

Adams, W. Y. 1977. "*Nubia: Corridor to Africa*". Princeton, NJ.

Abd-El-Nabi, O.M., Reisinger, E.C., Reinthaler, F.F., Still, F., Eibel,
U., Krejs, G.J., 1992." Antimicrobial activity of *Acacia nilotica* (L.)
Willd. ex Del. var. *nilotica* (Mimosaceae)". *Journal of
Ethnopharmacology*. 37:77-79.

Alvaro, C., M. Frangipane, G. Liberotti, R. Quaresima, and R. Volpe.
2011. "The Study of the Fourth Millennium Mudbricks at Arslantepe:
Malatya (Turkey): Preliminary Results". In Proceedings of the 37th
International Symposium on Archaeometry, edited by Turbanti- Memmi,
651--656. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Andrews, F.W. 1952. "*The flowering plants of the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan"*
(Volume II Sterculiacea-Dipsacaceae). Arbroath: T. Buncle & co. Ltd.

Arpin, T., and P. Goldberg. 2004. "Using Optical Microscopy to Evaluate
Human History." *Microscopy and Analysis* 18: 13--15.

Auwal, M.S., Shuaibu, A., Ibrahim, A., Mustapha, M., 2015.
"Antibacterial properties of crude pod extract of *Acacia nilotica*
(Fabaceae)". Haryana Veterin 54(1): 29-32.

Ayyad, S., K. Krzywinski, and R. Pierce. 1991. "Mudbrick as Bearer of
Agricultural Information: An Archaeopalynologic Study". Norwegian
Archaeological Review 24(2): 77--91.

Badura, M. 2012. "Plant remains from the Napatan settlement in Wadi
Umm-Rahau: An interim report". In H.-P. Wotzka (ed.), Proceedings of the
Third International Conference on the Archaeology of the Fourth Nile
Cataract, University of Cologne, 13--14 July 2006. Africa Praehistorica
22. Köln, 77-81.

Beldados, A. 2019. Millets in eastern Sudan: an archaeobotanical study,
Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa, 54:4, 501-515, DOI:
10.1080/0067270X.2019.1691844.

Bekele-Tesemma A. 2007. "Useful trees and shrubs of Ethiopia:
identification, Propagation and Management for 17 agroclimatic Zones".
World Agroforestry Centre, Kenya.

Bendixen, L.E. Nandihalli, U.B. 1987. "Worldwide distribution of purple
and yellow nutsedge (*C. rotundus* and C. *esculentus*)". Weed Technol
1:61--65.

Buckley, S., Usai, D., Jakob, T., Radini, A. and Hardy, K. 2014. "Dental
calculus reveals unique insights into food items, cooking, and plant
processing in prehistoric Central Sudan". *PLOS ONE* 7: 1-10.

Buthelezi, V. 2013. "Baobab". Xlibris LLC, USA.

Cartwright, C., 1998. "The wood, charcoal, plants remains and other
organic material". \[in:\] D. Welsby (ed.), Soba II: Renewed Excavations
at the Metropolis of the Kingdom of Alwa \[= British Institute in
Eastern Africa Monograph 15\], London: 255--268.

Doggett, Hugh. 1970. "Sorghum". Harlow, UK: Longman.

De Caluwe´ E. 2011. "Market chain analysis of baobab (Adansonia digitata
L.) and tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) products in Mali and Benin".
Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
Doctor (PhD) in Applied Biological Sciences: Agronomy, University Press,
Belgium.

Ebrahim, A.M., Eltayeb, M.H., Khalid, H., Mohamed, H., Abdalla, W.,
Grill, P., Michalke, B.2012. "Study on selected trace elements and heavy
metals in some popular medicinal plants from Sudan". *J. Natural Med*. 66(4): 671-679.

Fernandez, V.M. 1983. "La Cultura Alto-Meroitica del Norte de Nubia".
Unpublished Ph. D Dissertation, Universidad Complutense, Madrid.

Flower, R. J. 2006. "Diatoms in Ancient Building Materials: Application
of Diatom Analysis to Egyptian Mudbricks". *Nova Hedwigia* 82: 245--263.

Fuller, D. 2004. "Early Kushite agriculture: Archaeobotanical evidence
from Kawa". *Sudan and Nubia* 8:70-74.

Fuller, D. Edwards, D. 2001. "Medieval Plant Economy in Middle Nubia:
Preliminary Archaeobotanical Evidence from Nauri". *Sudan and Nubia* 5:
97- 103.

Fuller, D. Q., 2015. "The economic basis of the Qustul splinter state:
Cash crops, subsistence shifts, and labour demands in the post-Meroitic
transition". \[in:\] M. Zach (ed.), The Kushite World: Proceedings of
the 11th International Conference for Meroitic Studies, Vienna 1--4
September 2008, Vienna: 33--60.

Gebauer J, Ebert G. 2002. "Tropische Wildobstarten. Ein Potenzial fur
die Zukunft?" Humboldt- Spektrum 2/3:96--100

Geus, F., 2003. "Two seasons in Sai Island (1996--1997)". *Kush* 18:
61--73.

Hulse, Joseph H., Evangeline M. Laing, and Odette E. Pearson. 1980.
"Sorghum and millets: their composition and nutritive value". London:
Academic Press.

Gunasekera, T.G. Fernando, D.N.S.1994. "Agricultural importance,
biology, control and utilization Cyperus rotundus". *Planter*
70:537--544.

Hamdeen, H.M. Pokorny, P. 2022. "Plant Impressions from the Surfaces of
Christian Pottery at Banganarti". \[in:\] B. Żurawski (ed.) Banganarti
Studies II (Nubia VIII) Institute of Mediterranean and Oriental
Cultures. Polish Academy of Sciences. Warsaw: 199-213.

Hamdeen, H.M. 2022. "Preliminary observation on the Plants remains from
the Christian Mud- building in the Third Cataract Region, Northern
Sudan". Paper presented in the Sudan Studies Research Conference, Munich
Edition. Ludwig-Maximilian University of Munich. 25 June 2022.

Hamdeen, H. M. Madani, I. Tahir, Y. F. 2018. "Positive casts of wheat
and barley on the fire- mud Basin from the Christian site MRB-05-001 at
El Mirebiet oasis in El Ga'ab Depression, Western Dongola, Sudan".
*Sudan and Nubia* No 22: 167-171.

Hardy, K. and Kubiak-Martens, L. (eds). 2016). "Wild harvest: plants in
the hominin and pre- agrarian worlds". Oxbow Books, Oxford.

Henn, T., S. Jacomet, D. U. Nagy, and R. W. P. 2014. "Desiccated
Diaspores from Building Materials: Methodological Aspects of Processing
Mudbrick for Archaeobotanical Studies and First Results of a Study of
Earth Buildings in Southwest Hungary." *Vegetation History and
Archaeobotany* 24(3): 427--440.

Hillman, G. 1984 "Traditional Husbandry and Processing of Archaic
Cereals in Recent Times: The Operations, Products and Equipment Which
Might Feature in Sumerian Texts Part 1: The Glume Wheats". Bulletin on
Sumerian Agriculture 1: 114--52.

Houben, H., Guillard, H. 1994. "Earth Construction: A Comprehensive
Guide". Intermediate Technology Publications. London.

Homsher, R.S.2012. "Mudbricks and the Process of Construction in the
Middle Bronze Age Southern Levant". *Near Eastern Archaeology*, Vol. 75,
No. 4: 1-27.

Houben, H., and Guillaud, H. 1994 "Earth Construction: A Comprehensive
Guide". London: Intermediate Technology.

Iwu, M.M .2014. "Handbook of African medicinal plants". CRC Press, USA.

Kabore´ D, Sawadogo-Lingani H, Diawara B, Compaore´ CS, Dicko MH,
Jakobsen M. 2011. "A review of baobab (*Adansonia digitata*) products:
effect of processing techniques, medicinal properties and uses". *Afr J Food Sci* 5:833--844.

Kahlheber, S. 2013. 'Archaeobotanical Investigations at the Gala Abu
Ahmed Fortress in Lower Wadi Howar, Northern Sudan. The fruit and seed
remains', Sudan & Nubia 17, 33-41.

Kamatou, G.P. Vermaak I, Viljoen A.M. 2011 "An updated review of
Adansonia digitata: a commercially important African tree". *Econ Bot*
77:908--919.

Lim T.K. 2012. "Edible medicinal and non-medicinal plants: volume 1,
fruits. Springer, Netherlands.

Love, S. 2013. "Architecture as Material Culture: Building Form and
Materiality in the Pre- Pottery Neolithic of Anatolia and Levant".
*Journal of Anthropological Archaeology* 32(4): 746-- 758.

Madani, I. Tahir, Y. F., Hamdeen, H. M. 2015. "Plant macroremains
recovered from El-Hamra Christian complex excavation in El-Ga'ab
depression, Sudan". *Sudan & Nubia* 19: 143--148.

Mabberley, DJ. 2008. "*A portable dictionary of plants, their
classification and uses".* (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.

Majid, A. A. 1989. "Exploitation of plants in the Eastern Sahel (Sudan),
5,000--2,000 B.C". In: Krzyzaniak L, Kobusiewicz M (Eds) Late prehistory
of the Nile Basin and the Sahara. Poznan Museum, Pozan: 459--468.

Minke, G. 2006. "Building with Earth Design and Technology of a
Sustainable Architecture". Birkhäuser -- Publishers for Architecture.
Berlin.

Mohammed, Abdel Hadi. 1978. "A Survey of the Third Cataract Region
(Western Bank of the Nile). Unpublished BA Dissertation, University of
Khartoum.

Morgenstein, M., and C. Redmount. 1998. "Mudbrick Typology, Sources and
Sedimentological Composition: A Case Study from Tell El- Muqdam,
Egyptian Delta". *Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt* 35:
129--146.

Mueller MS, Mechler E. 2005. "Medicinal plants in tropical countries.
Traditional use-- experience--facts". Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart,
Germany.

Nussinovitch A. 2010. "Plant gum exudates of the world: sources,
distribution, properties, and application". CRC Press, USA.

O'Rourke, M. K. 1983. "Pollen from Adobe Brick*." Journal of
Ethnobiology* 3(1): 39--48.

Osman, A. and Edwards, D. N. 2012. "*The Archaeology of a Nubian
Frontier: Survey on the Nile Third Cataract"*. Bristol.

Osman M.A.2004. "Chemical and nutrient analysis of baobab (*Adansonia
digitata*) fruit and seed protein solubility". *Plant Foods Hum Nutr*
59:29--33.

Out, W. A, P. Ryan, J. J. García-Granero, J. Barastegui, L. Maritan and
M. Madella 2016. "Plant exploitation in Neolithic Sudan: A review in the
light of new data from the cemeteries R12 and Ghaba". *Quaternary
International* 412: 36-53.

Pock Tsy, J-ML, Lumaret R, Mayne D, Vall AOM, Abutaba YIM, Sangna M.
2009. "Chloroplast DNA phylogeography suggests a West African centre of
origin for the baobab, *Adansonia digitata* L. (Bombacoideae,
Malvaceae)". *Mol Ecol* 18 (8):1707-1715.

Pokorna A., and Beneš J. 2014. "Plant Macroremains from the Old Kingdom
Mudbrick Construction of the Werkaure tomb. Results of Carpological and
Xylotomical Analyses". In (eds.\|) J. Krejí. Mastaba of Werkaure. Vol. I
(Old Kingdom Strata). Prague: Charles University in Prague, Faculty of
Arts: 283--293.

Pumpelly, R. 1980. (ed.) "Explorations in Turkestan". Washington, USA.

Rowley-Conwy, P.A. 1991. "Sorghum from Qasr Ibrim, Egyptian Nubia,
c.800BC -- 1811AD: A preliminary Study". In Renderw, J. M (ed.): New
light on Early Farming. Recent Developments in Paleoethnobotany.
Edinburgh: University Press. Pp 191-211.

Rowley-Conwy, P.A. Deakin, W.J. Shaw, C.H. 1997. "Ancient DNA from
Archaeological Sorghum (Sorghum bicolour) from Qasr Ibrim, Nubia. Implications for
Domestications and Evolution and Review of Archaeological Evidence".
*Sahara* 9: 23-34.

Ryan, P., C. Cartwright and N. Spencer 2012. "Archaeobotanical research
in a pharaonic town in ancient Nubia". Technical Research Bulletin 6.
London: 97-107.

Riggs, C. R. 2001. "The Architecture of Grasshopper Pueblo. Salt Lake
City". University of Utah Press.

Roberts M. 1990. "Indigenous healing plants. Southern Book Publishers".
South Africa.

Ryan, P. 2013. "Phytoliths In Humans and Landscapes of Catalhoyuk:
Reports from the 2000-- 2008 Seasons". Edited by I. Hodder, 163--190.
Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology.

Schu¨tt P, Wolf, H. 2004. „*Adansonia digitata*". In: Schu¨ tt P,
Weisgerber H, Schuck HJ, Lang U, Stimm B, Roloff A (eds.) Ba¨ume der
Tropen. Nicol Verlagsgesellschaft, Germany.

Sergeev A. Yu., Lebedeva E. Yu., Lebedev M. A. 2019. "Mudbricks from
Giza and Abu Erteila: Archaeobotanical, Technological, and Historical
Aspects of Study". Vostok (Oriens). No. 5: 6-29\. DOI: 10.31857/S086919080006891-7.

Shinnie, P. L. and J. R. Anderson. 2004. "The Capital of Kush 2. Meroë
Excavations 1973- 1984". Meroitica 20. Wiesbaden.

Singh, B.N., Singh, B.R., Singh, R.L., Prakash, D., Sarma, B.K., Singh,
H.B. 2009. "Antioxidant and anti-quorum sensing activities of green pod
of *Acacia nilotica* L". *Food Chem. Toxicol*. 47(4): 778--786.

Snowden, Joseph D. 1936. "The cultivated races of Sorghum". London.
Adlard & Sons.

Stemler, Ann B. L. 1990. "A scanning electron microscopic analysis of
plant impressions in pottery from the sites of Kadero, El Zakiab, Um
Direiwa and El Kadada". *Archéologie du Nil Moyen* 4:87--105.

Teel W, Hirst, T.1990. "A pocket directory of trees and seeds in Kenya".
Kengo. Kenya.

Trigger, B. G., 1965. "History and Settlement in Lower Nubia". Yale
University Publication in Anthropology 69. New Haven, CT.

Van Beek, G. W., and Van Beek, O. 2008. "Glorious Mud! Ancient and
Contemporary Earthen Design and Construction in North Africa, Western
Europe, the Near East, and Southwest Asia". Washington, DC: Smithsonian
Institute Scholarly.

Van der Veen, M., 1991. "The Plant Remains". \[in:\] D.A. Welsby, C. M.
Daniels (eds.), Soba: Archaeological Research at a Medieval Capital on
the Blue Nile \[= British Institute in Eastern Africa Monograph 12.
London: 264--274.

Vantini, G. 1975. "Oriental Sources Concerning Nubia". Warsaw --
Heidelberg.

Van Wyk B.E. 2006. "Food plants of the world: an illustrated guide".
Timber Press. USA.

Venter F, Venter J.A. 1996. "Marking the most of indigenous trees".
Briza Publications, Singapore.

Wasylikowa, Krystyna, and Jeff Dahlberg. 1999. "Sorghum in the economy
of the Early Neolithic nomadic tribes at Nabta Playa, southern Egypt".
van der Veen, M. (eds.). In The exploitation of plant resources in
ancient Africa. . New York: Kluwer: 11--32

Walsh R.P.D. 1991. "Climate, hydrology, and water resources". In: Craig
GM (eds.) The agriculture of the Sudan. Oxford University Press.

Wenkel, A.2014. "Im Schatten des Baobabs". Jaja Verlag, Germany.

Wilcox, G., and S. Fornite. 1999. "Impressions of Wild Cereal Chaff in
Pise from the 10th Millennium Uncal B.P. At Jerf Ahmar and Mureybet:
Northern Syria." *Vegetation History and Archaeobotany* 8: 21--24.

Winchell, F., Stevens, C., Murphy, C., Fuller, D.Q., Manzo, A. and
Beldados, A. 2017. "Evidence for sorghum domestication in fourth
millennium BC eastern Sudan: spikelet morphology from ceramic
impressions of the Butana Group". *Current Anthropology* 58: 673--683.

Zohary, D. and Hopf, M. 1988. "Domestications of plants in the Old
World, the origin and spread of cultivated plants in West Asia, Europe
and the Nile Valley". Oxford University Press.

[^1]: Alvaro et al. 2011; Arpin and Goldberg 2004; Morgenstein and
    Redmount 1998.

[^2]: On the active role of architecture as material culture, see Love
    2013; Riggs 2001. On mudbrick as a good source for botanical
    evidence, see Henn et al.2014. On chaff impressions, see Wilcox and
    Fornite 1999. On phytoliths, see Ryan 2013. On diatoms, see Flower
    2006. On pollen, see Ayyad *et al*.1991; O' Rourke 1983

[^3]: Pumpelly 1980.

[^4]: Minke 2006:11-12.

[^5]: Van Beek and Van Beek 2008: 135.

[^6]: Hillman 1984: 127-- 28.

[^7]: Homsher 2012:3.

[^8]: Mohammed 1978: 55; Osman and Edwards 2012.

[^9]: Mohammed 1978: 53-- 4; Osman and Edwards 2012.

[^10]: Pokorná and Beneš 2014.

[^11]: Homsher 2012; Houben and Guillaud 1994: 82.

[^12]: Sergeev *et al* (2019).

[^13]: Zohary and Hopf 1988, 13

[^14]: On the use of plants during the burial ceremony, see Out *et al*.
    2015; Out *et al*. 2016. On the dating of the site, see Geus 2003.

[^15]: Ryan *et al.* 2012.

[^16]: On the Napatan site HP736 in the Wadi Umm Rahau at the Fourth
    Nile Cataract, see Badura 2012. On the Egyptian and Napatan site in
    Kawa, see Fuller 2004. On Gala Abu Ahmad, see Kahlheber 2013. On
    Meroe, see Shinnie and Anderson 2004, 366.

[^17]: Fuller *et al*. 2014.

[^18]: Doggett 1970; Hulse et al 1980; Snowden 1936.

[^19]: On the Eastern Sahara, see Wasylikowa et al 1995. On Central
    Sudan, see Stemler 1990.

[^20]: Rowley-Conwy 1991; Rowley -Conwy et al 1997.

[^21]: Winchell et al 2017.

[^22]: Magid 1989.

[^23]: Beldados, 2019: 507, 509.

[^24]: Fernandez 1983.

[^25]: Fuller and Edwards 2001.

[^26]: Fuller 2015.

[^27]: Adam 1977; Trigger 1965.

[^28]: Fuller 2015.

[^29]: On the historical texts, see Vantini 1975.

[^30]: Wadi Kubbaniya, near Aswan, Egypt, see Hardy and Kubiak-Martens
    2016.

[^31]: On the complex of burial sites, see Buckley et al. 2014). On
    Kawa, see Fuller 2004: 71.

[^32]: Auld and Medd 1987; Parsons and Cuthbertson 2001.

[^33]: Bendixen and Nandihalli 1987.

[^34]: Gunasekera and Fernando 1994.

[^35]: Buckley et al. 2014; Hamdeen 2022.

[^36]: On the medicinal and nutritional values, see Andrews 1952;
    Mabberley 2008. On importation by pastorialists, see Pock Tsy et al.
    2009.

[^37]: On foodstuffs to local communities, see van Wyk 2006, Kabore et
    al. 2011. On fodder, see Venter and Venter 1996; De Caluwe´ 2001;
    Bekele- Tesemma 2007. On fibers for weaving and rope-making, see
    Teel and Hirst 1990. On gum, see Roberts 1990; Nussinovitch 2010. On
    seed oil, see Osman 2004 ; Kamatou et al. 2011. On natural medicine,
    see Mueller and Mechler 2005; Iwu 2014; Lim 2012. On materials for
    dishes, seeSchütt and Wolf 2004. On water storage, see Walsh 1991.

[^38]: Gebauer and Ebert 2002.

[^39]: Buthelezi 2013; Wenkel 2014.

[^40]: Beldados 2017.

[^41]: Abd-El-Nabi et al., 1992.

[^42]: Ebrahim et al., 2012.

[^43]: Auwal et al., 2015.

[^44]: Singh et al., 2009.

[^45]: Abdalla et al 2014.

[^46]: On Kawa, see Fuller: 2004:71. On Nauri, see Fuller and Edwards
    2001:99. On Banganarti, see Hamdeen and Pokorny 2022:208.

[^47]: Hamdeen and Pokorny 2022.