Compare commits
3 commits
6c4e29538f
...
1066a2046b
Author | SHA1 | Date | |
---|---|---|---|
1066a2046b | |||
00b6a5da9c | |||
d64003edff |
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ Northern Nubia
|
|||
| | Ἀβραὰμ ϥ̣\[θ\] |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
3 τιμ̅ο̅θ̅ε̅α stone \|\| 5 μη stone \|\| 6 ϊνδ ϊε stone \| ανα stone \|\| 7
|
||||
3 τιμ̅ο̅θε̅α stone \|\| 5 μη stone \|\| 6 ϊνδ<sub>/</sub> ϊε stone \| ανα stone \|\| 7
|
||||
αυτη̅ stone \|\| 8 θϲ̅ stone, which is pitted above the preceding
|
||||
*omikron* (probably a chance mark, not a diacritic) \| κολποιϲ stone;
|
||||
read ἐν κόλποις or εἰς κόλπους
|
||||
|
@ -267,14 +267,14 @@ Abraham, 99 (=amen).
|
|||
|
||||
*Commentary*
|
||||
|
||||
3 Τιμοθέα (τιμ̅ο̅θ̅ε̅α on the stone). Overlining of personal names is
|
||||
3 Τιμοθέα (τιμ̅ο̅θε̅α on the stone). Overlining of personal names is
|
||||
occasionally found in epitaphs: Nikea (Νικεα, an apparent nominative in
|
||||
what should be the genitive of a female name) in *I.Chr. Egypte* 627
|
||||
from northern Nubia (Talmis), and Deidō (in the genitive Δειδους) in
|
||||
*I.Chr. Egypte* 525 from southern Egypt (Hermonthis?). Neither of these
|
||||
instances could have been conflated with a *nomen sacrum*, which might
|
||||
otherwise have influenced the scribal practice here (cf. θϲ̅ for θ(εό)ς
|
||||
in 8 below), that is, overlining θ̅ε̅ as if θ(ε)έ, then extending the
|
||||
in 8 below), that is, overlining θε̅ as if θ(ε)έ, then extending the
|
||||
overline to the left.
|
||||
|
||||
This is the first instance of the name Timothea in published texts from
|
||||
|
@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ which was later brought to Cairo (Monneret de Villard, *Nubia
|
|||
medioevale*, p. 41, lines 3--4: read Τικετη ἐτελεύτησεν in place of τικε
|
||||
τη ετελευτηϲ εν); and likely a sandstone funerary cross from Ghazali
|
||||
(*I.Khartoum Greek* 45: \[ἐ\]τελεύ̣\[τησεν\] probably to be restored in
|
||||
line 5 with the editor \[accepted also in *I.Ghazali* 210\]\]).
|
||||
line 5 with the editor \[accepted also in *I.Ghazali* 210\]).
|
||||
Corruptions, in ancient or modern copying, could also be suspected in
|
||||
two cases from Taphis (Ginari): of επη (sic: ἐ⟨τελευτ⟩ή⟨σεν⟩?) in the
|
||||
corresponding place in Firth 124, and of the confused
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue