bracket

content/article/zellmann.md

@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ Northern Nubia
 |  |  Ἀβραὰμ ϥ̣\[θ\] |
 
 
-3 τιμ̅ο̅θ̅ε̅α stone \|\| 5 μη stone \|\| 6 ϊνδ ϊε stone \| ανα stone \|\| 7
+3 τιμ̅ο̅θε̅α stone \|\| 5 μη stone \|\| 6 ϊνδ<sub>/</sub> ϊε stone \| ανα stone \|\| 7
 αυτη̅ stone \|\| 8 θϲ̅ stone, which is pitted above the preceding
 *omikron* (probably a chance mark, not a diacritic) \| κολποιϲ stone;
 read ἐν κόλποις or εἰς κόλπους
@@ -267,14 +267,14 @@ Abraham, 99 (=amen).
 
 *Commentary*
 
-3 Τιμοθέα (τιμ̅ο̅θ̅ε̅α on the stone). Overlining of personal names is
+3 Τιμοθέα (τιμ̅ο̅θε̅α on the stone). Overlining of personal names is
 occasionally found in epitaphs: Nikea (Νικεα, an apparent nominative in
 what should be the genitive of a female name) in *I.Chr. Egypte* 627
 from northern Nubia (Talmis), and Deidō (in the genitive Δειδους) in
 *I.Chr. Egypte* 525 from southern Egypt (Hermonthis?). Neither of these
 instances could have been conflated with a *nomen sacrum*, which might
 otherwise have influenced the scribal practice here (cf. θϲ̅ for θ(εό)ς
-in 8 below), that is, overlining θ̅ε̅ as if θ(ε)έ, then extending the
+in 8 below), that is, overlining θε̅ as if θ(ε)έ, then extending the
 overline to the left.
 
 This is the first instance of the name Timothea in published texts from
@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ which was later brought to Cairo (Monneret de Villard, *Nubia
 medioevale*, p. 41, lines 3--4: read Τικετη ἐτελεύτησεν in place of τικε
 τη ετελευτηϲ εν); and likely a sandstone funerary cross from Ghazali
 (*I.Khartoum Greek* 45: \[ἐ\]τελεύ̣\[τησεν\] probably to be restored in
-line 5 with the editor \[accepted also in *I.Ghazali* 210\]\]).
+line 5 with the editor \[accepted also in *I.Ghazali* 210\]).
 Corruptions, in ancient or modern copying, could also be suspected in
 two cases from Taphis (Ginari): of επη (sic: ἐ⟨τελευτ⟩ή⟨σεν⟩?) in the
 corresponding place in Firth 124, and of the confused