From 00b6a5da9cfe743c6725820869dac259da425d24 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexandros Tsakos Date: Fri, 5 May 2023 16:19:03 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] theta --- content/article/zellmann.md | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/content/article/zellmann.md b/content/article/zellmann.md index 7f6ab3e..22bec63 100644 --- a/content/article/zellmann.md +++ b/content/article/zellmann.md @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ Northern Nubia | | Ἀβραὰμ ϥ̣\[θ\] | -3 τιμ̅ο̅θ̅ε̅α stone \|\| 5 μη stone \|\| 6 ϊνδ/ ϊε stone \| ανα stone \|\| 7 +3 τιμ̅ο̅θε̅α stone \|\| 5 μη stone \|\| 6 ϊνδ/ ϊε stone \| ανα stone \|\| 7 αυτη̅ stone \|\| 8 θϲ̅ stone, which is pitted above the preceding *omikron* (probably a chance mark, not a diacritic) \| κολποιϲ stone; read ἐν κόλποις or εἰς κόλπους @@ -267,14 +267,14 @@ Abraham, 99 (=amen). *Commentary* -3 Τιμοθέα (τιμ̅ο̅θ̅ε̅α on the stone). Overlining of personal names is +3 Τιμοθέα (τιμ̅ο̅θε̅α on the stone). Overlining of personal names is occasionally found in epitaphs: Nikea (Νικεα, an apparent nominative in what should be the genitive of a female name) in *I.Chr. Egypte* 627 from northern Nubia (Talmis), and Deidō (in the genitive Δειδους) in *I.Chr. Egypte* 525 from southern Egypt (Hermonthis?). Neither of these instances could have been conflated with a *nomen sacrum*, which might otherwise have influenced the scribal practice here (cf. θϲ̅ for θ(εό)ς -in 8 below), that is, overlining θ̅ε̅ as if θ(ε)έ, then extending the +in 8 below), that is, overlining θε̅ as if θ(ε)έ, then extending the overline to the left. This is the first instance of the name Timothea in published texts from