diff --git a/content/reflection/relational.md b/content/reflection/relational.md
index efdaa7b..300196a 100644
--- a/content/reflection/relational.md
+++ b/content/reflection/relational.md
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ In this sense, the library, as a model, an infrastructure, and more than anythin
 
 In this sense, some of the foundations of the publishing preserving (the library) systems are questioned in this different systemic embodiment. It is inevitable then to mention Barthes’ consequential relationship between the “birth of the reader” and “the death of the author”[^2]. They deeply question “ownership, copyright and the subjects supposed to know” (see ![](shard:neoliberallibrary.md)), which can be connected with what we might call now a neoliberal vision of the library.
 
-What these libraries (possibly both online and offline) outside of the official library system build over time, is to provide the missed content, the specialised care and the shared responsibility conceptually adding them independently to the public services. As Horvat affirms, "it’s a process and a relation" (see ![](shard:processnotplace.md)).
+What these libraries (possibly both online and offline) outside of the official library system build over time, is to provide the missed content, the specialised care and the shared responsibility conceptually adding them independently to the public services. As ![Horvat](glassblower:sreckohorvat.md) affirms, "it’s a process and a relation" (see ![](shard:processnotplace.md)).
 
 [^1]: ![](bib:51f75bc9-c586-4abd-8fa0-721609ad0dd2)
 [^2]: ![](bib:25f86ef8-70d5-4dc4-8ce9-2ae7f46dbfd9)