diff --git a/content/shard/custodianshipinrelationalpractices.md b/content/shard/custodianshipinrelationalpractices.md
index dbb5544..4a905a1 100644
--- a/content/shard/custodianshipinrelationalpractices.md
+++ b/content/shard/custodianshipinrelationalpractices.md
@@ -3,4 +3,8 @@ title = "The role of relational practices in custodianship"
 glassblowers = ["alessandroludovico.md"]
 +++
 
-Relational practices should be the building infrastructure of custodianship. Personal interdependent networks can extend the library, branching (forking?) the current library model, and providing the missed content in the public service.
+Relational practices should be the conceptual building infrastructure of custodianship. These practices are caring processes, which can be mutual, instigating further care and relationships[^1]. This mutuality potentially creates relationships, which might constitute interdependent networks. These networks can be used to extend the library.  branching (forking?) the current library model
+
+and providing the missed content in the public service. As Horvat affirms "it’s a process and a relation" ![](shard:processnotplace.md)
+
+[^1]:Bourriaud Nicolas Mathieu Copeland Simon Pleasance and Fronza Woods. 2010. Relational Aesthetics. Dijon: Les presses du réel.