From 73b92b31c01861a332eb4dde732f093dd1b82f0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: alessandro Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 09:51:21 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Update 'content/shard/custodianshipinrelationalpractices.md' --- content/shard/custodianshipinrelationalpractices.md | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/content/shard/custodianshipinrelationalpractices.md b/content/shard/custodianshipinrelationalpractices.md index eec6da2..031f0bb 100644 --- a/content/shard/custodianshipinrelationalpractices.md +++ b/content/shard/custodianshipinrelationalpractices.md @@ -5,7 +5,4 @@ glassblowers = ["alessandroludovico.md"] Relational practices should be the conceptual building infrastructure of custodianship. These practices are caring processes, which can be mutual, instigating further care and relationships[^1]. This mutuality potentially creates relationships, which might help to constitute interdependent networks of people and content, formulating different communication protocols which can be understood as "abstractions on social processes"![](shard:protocols.md) These interdependent networks can be used to extend the library. It is a process to branch (or even 'fork') the library models which have a centralised nature. What they build over time, is to provide the missed content, the specialised care and the shared responsability conceptually adding them independently to the public services. As Horvat affirms "it’s a process and a relation" ![](shard:processnotplace.md). -[^1]:Bourriaud Nicolas Mathieu Copeland Simon Pleasance and Fronza Woods. 2010. Relational Aesthetics. Dijon: Les presses du réel. - - -The formal mechanisms of communication protocols are the way of facilitating this aggregation. They are abstractions on social processes which produce global artifacts, with traces back to the local. \ No newline at end of file +[^1]:Bourriaud Nicolas Mathieu Copeland Simon Pleasance and Fronza Woods. 2010. Relational Aesthetics. Dijon: Les presses du réel. \ No newline at end of file