CustodiansOnline/MirrorUbu
10
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 1 Pull requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

!publish!

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Marcell Mars 2024-05-19 23:55:06 +02:00
parent 99315d9dd5
commit 5f03e65816
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
content/reflection/decapitated.md
View file

@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ One is about meaning out of language—referencing Godard (see ![](shard:sense-c
The other is in archives, void of content, and back to the gesture. (see: ![](shard:appendix.md)) The other is in archives, void of content, and back to the gesture. (see: ![](shard:appendix.md))
Both dots should provide a trajectory for recovering the imaginary. (see: ![](shard:imaginary.md)) Both dots should provide a trajectory for recovering the imaginary. (see: ![](shard:theimaginary.md))
I do not know. I don't know if ![nihilism](shard:nihilism.md) (the time in which we find ourselves, the time in which UbuWeb is no longer active, precisely because UbuWeb is no longer ready to receive and store new material) can trigger all that is given and flip it to an avalanche that restores meaning. Should the sense of that or such meaning be restored? Flipped archives where the archived keep the gates opened and let enter the meaning, any meaning. This is not what has been written: “Although UbuWeb is publicly accessible, the public has no say about what goes or doesn't go on the site. We don't take unsolicited submissions; we post work erratically and sporadically, never according to a schedule. And the works that we choose are there because we want them to be there, not because they fulfill any curriculums, quotas, or canons. While we want to expose people to wonderful and underappreciated works of art (and, of course, provide new perspectives on tired notions of the avant-garde), everything on the site is there primarily because it’s meaningful to us, for reasons we don't feel the need to explain. And since we don;t take any money, we don't have to answer to anybody regarding the content we host on the site. Is that approach biased? Yes. Is it incomplete? Yes. Is it imperfect? Yes. Is it the way we want to do it? Yes. All the way.” (see: ![](shard:appendix.md)) I do not know. I don't know if ![nihilism](shard:nihilism.md) (the time in which we find ourselves, the time in which UbuWeb is no longer active, precisely because UbuWeb is no longer ready to receive and store new material) can trigger all that is given and flip it to an avalanche that restores meaning. Should the sense of that or such meaning be restored? Flipped archives where the archived keep the gates opened and let enter the meaning, any meaning. This is not what has been written: “Although UbuWeb is publicly accessible, the public has no say about what goes or doesn't go on the site. We don't take unsolicited submissions; we post work erratically and sporadically, never according to a schedule. And the works that we choose are there because we want them to be there, not because they fulfill any curriculums, quotas, or canons. While we want to expose people to wonderful and underappreciated works of art (and, of course, provide new perspectives on tired notions of the avant-garde), everything on the site is there primarily because it’s meaningful to us, for reasons we don't feel the need to explain. And since we don;t take any money, we don't have to answer to anybody regarding the content we host on the site. Is that approach biased? Yes. Is it incomplete? Yes. Is it imperfect? Yes. Is it the way we want to do it? Yes. All the way.” (see: ![](shard:appendix.md))