Add 'content/shard/subversionofcopyright.md'
This commit is contained in:
parent
8a18a089a9
commit
72ee66c1d2
1 changed files with 51 additions and 0 deletions
51
content/shard/subversionofcopyright.md
Normal file
51
content/shard/subversionofcopyright.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
|
|||
+++
|
||||
title = "Avant-gardist subversion of copyright"
|
||||
glassblowers = ["tomislavmedak.md"]
|
||||
+++
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Even the avant-gardes in all their inappropriable and idiosyncratic
|
||||
recalcitrance fall no less under the legally delimited space of
|
||||
copyrightable works. As they shift format, new claims of ownership and
|
||||
appropriation are built. Copyright is a normative classification that is
|
||||
totalizing, regardless of the effects of leaky networks speaking to the
|
||||
contrary. Few efforts have insisted on the subverting of juridical
|
||||
classification by copyright more lastingly than the UbuWeb archive.
|
||||
Espousing the avant-gardes' ethos of appropriation, for almost 20 years
|
||||
it has collected and made accessible the archives of the unknown;
|
||||
outsider, rare and canonized avant-gardes and contemporary art that
|
||||
would otherwise remained reserved for the vaults and restricted access
|
||||
channels of esoteric markets, selective museological presentations and
|
||||
institutional archives. Knowing that asking to publish would amount to
|
||||
aligning itself with the totalizing logic of copyright, UbuWeb has
|
||||
shunned the permission culture. At the level of poetical operation, as a
|
||||
gesture of displacing the cultural archive from a regime of limited,
|
||||
into a regime of unlimited access, it has created provocations and
|
||||
challenges directed at the classifying and ordering arrangements of
|
||||
property over cultural production. One can only assume that as such it
|
||||
has become a mechanism for small acts of treason for the artists, who,
|
||||
short of turning their back fully on the institutional arrangements of
|
||||
the art world they inhabit, use UbuWeb to release their own works into
|
||||
unlimited circulation on the net. Sometimes there might be no way or
|
||||
need to produce a work outside the restrictions imposed by those
|
||||
institutions, just as sometimes it is for academics impossible to avoid
|
||||
the contradictory world of academic publishing, yet that is still no
|
||||
reason to keep one's allegiance to their arrangements.
|
||||
|
||||
At the same time UbuWeb has played the game of avant-gardist subversion:
|
||||
"If it doesn't exist on the internet, it doesn't exist". Provocation is
|
||||
most effective when it is ignorant of the complexities of the contexts
|
||||
that it is directed at. Its effect starts where fissures in the defense
|
||||
of the opposition start to show. By treating UbuWeb as massive evidence
|
||||
for the internet as a process of reappropriation, a process of "giving
|
||||
to all", its volunteering *spiritus movens,* Kenneth Goldsmith, has been
|
||||
constantly rubbing copyright apologists up the wrong way. Rather than
|
||||
producing qualifications, evasions and ambivalences, straightforward
|
||||
affirmation of copying, plagiarism and reproduction as a dominant yet
|
||||
suppressed mode of operation of digital culture re-enacts the
|
||||
avant-gardes' gesture of taking no hostages from the officially
|
||||
sanctioned systems of classification. By letting the incumbents of
|
||||
control over cultural production react to the norm of copying, you let
|
||||
them struggle to dispute the norm rather than you having to try to
|
||||
defend the norm.
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue